Post by jakir213 on Feb 20, 2024 9:54:37 GMT 1
That could be one of the conclusions of the V PIONEERS CONGRESS OF SPANISH MODERN ARCHITECTURE: THE HABITAR PROJECT , organized by the Alejandro de la Sota Foundation in collaboration with the Ministry of Public Works. The congress focuses mainly on analyzing, studying and reflecting on works or projects of high interest, which may be considered pioneers in our way of doing architecture. They are projects carried out by architects born around 1920, whose legacy and thoughts are still valid today. A conference that proposes a reflection through different presentations, previously selected by a Scientific Committee, which are based on the criticism and analysis of an architectural work according to its sociocultural context and influences of its authors. This edition was held in the month of May in a unique setting, the Arquerías de Nuevos Ministerios in Madrid.
Alejandro de la Sota always had an obsession that his work and thoughts could reach students, researchers and architects. His contemporaries such as Sáenz de Oiza , Fisac, Coderch, Corrales, Bonet or Asis Cabreo also lived moments of creative splendor, which gave rise to an alternative to the post-war and monumental architecture of the time. The scarcity of resources UAE Phone Number and accommodation gave rise to a new scenario for debate and even experimentation. Project “To make real architecture, for a house to become architecture, you have to add something more and what drove that change was a series of very sensitive concepts, because is it okay in the places where we go?” -Alejandro De la Sota- Build, Think and Live Starting from these premises, each presentation had to focus on a single residential project, which could range from a single-family home to a hotel or dormitory school.
For two days, emblematic buildings such as the Casa Durana (Ekain Jiménez and Rodrigo Almonacid), the Casa Domínguez (Ana Pascual and Antonio S. Río), the Casa Castanera ( Juan Fernando Ródenas and Manuel Ferrer ), the ALSA building in Oviedo were analyzed. (Gerardo Arancón) or Las Torres Blancas ( Alejandro Ferraz-Leite ), to name a few examples. The living project had become a place of experimentation, whose objective was to define the home of modern man. Many terms now in force were beginning to take shape and influence later works: Get to the house through a square. Link architecture to the place, the environment and its inhabitants. Architecture as landscape. Simple home programs around a central unit. Taming the interior. Routes and interior landscapes. Quality and comfort criteria.
Alejandro de la Sota always had an obsession that his work and thoughts could reach students, researchers and architects. His contemporaries such as Sáenz de Oiza , Fisac, Coderch, Corrales, Bonet or Asis Cabreo also lived moments of creative splendor, which gave rise to an alternative to the post-war and monumental architecture of the time. The scarcity of resources UAE Phone Number and accommodation gave rise to a new scenario for debate and even experimentation. Project “To make real architecture, for a house to become architecture, you have to add something more and what drove that change was a series of very sensitive concepts, because is it okay in the places where we go?” -Alejandro De la Sota- Build, Think and Live Starting from these premises, each presentation had to focus on a single residential project, which could range from a single-family home to a hotel or dormitory school.
For two days, emblematic buildings such as the Casa Durana (Ekain Jiménez and Rodrigo Almonacid), the Casa Domínguez (Ana Pascual and Antonio S. Río), the Casa Castanera ( Juan Fernando Ródenas and Manuel Ferrer ), the ALSA building in Oviedo were analyzed. (Gerardo Arancón) or Las Torres Blancas ( Alejandro Ferraz-Leite ), to name a few examples. The living project had become a place of experimentation, whose objective was to define the home of modern man. Many terms now in force were beginning to take shape and influence later works: Get to the house through a square. Link architecture to the place, the environment and its inhabitants. Architecture as landscape. Simple home programs around a central unit. Taming the interior. Routes and interior landscapes. Quality and comfort criteria.